Guys, let's make a difference
http://www.impeachbush.org
Let's get 1,000,000 names!
If this administration has it's way, you'll not see great sites like this on the web anymore! So tell your congressmen to start impeachment proceedings against this administration! We need to be free again!
C'mon, guys. Read what Webby said...
I'll tell you what's raised the Webmaster's ire (and it should be raising your ire as well, guys!) If Dubya and his Busheviks keep whittling down on our personal liberties, he'll have some pseudo-moralistic zombie from the extremist Religious Right persecuting anyone and everyone who doesn't endorse both Bush and the Jerry Falwell Rapturist ideologues and their over-zealous apocalyptic bullcrap. In other words, guys like you and Webby and me will be labeled as anti-Christ subversives, perverts, and "terrorists" and find ourselves unconstitutionally persecurted. Web sties like this one will be SHUT DOWN. Would the Rapturist-Busheviks shutting sites like this down entirely and making them illegal finally get your attention? Would some of you guys be croaking "I wanna see more pictures of macho feet!" as the thought police are dragging your asses to the paddy wagon? The good Webmaster asks you to support him in impeachng Bush so that our liberty to support boards such as this one and the freedom to live and be what we are won't be taken away from us. In my own view, the Webby should be congratulated for taking a stand as he has--not scorchingly attacked and sneered at. C'mon guys, wake up! :roll:
Dick Cheney as President... would this change anything?
"President Dick Cheney"? or how about
"President Dennis Hastert"?
If you're concerned about current levels of censorship, your efforts are probably best spent targeting FCC regulations by pressuring your congressmen and senators to direct the agency differently through legal changes, rather than on feel-good efforts at impeachment. Even if it were successful, it would only address the censorship issue indirectly and would result in very little policy change as Dick Cheney would officially assume the Presidency. Given his considerable role in current policy development, I doubt there would be any changes. (If the impeachment website had its way, Republican Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert would become President. Again, probably little change.)
People in both parties have jumped on the censorship bandwagon, so it's hard to say whether the next person in office will approach this issue any differently, regardless of their party. Righteous indignation is very fashionable on the Hill.
The case laid out on the website would probably not pass Senate scrutiny even if the Democrats were in charge there. The only issue I'm aware of that you might be able to make a case for the President intentionally violating a law would be the ordering of part of the Ingelligence Community to monitor U.S. citizens without a warrant. The article in favor of impeachment on the website attempts to lay out a case so broad it doesn't read like a strong legal argument.